james bond 007: casino royale - JB backstory!

updated: 23nov'06 (1:30am)
salam 2 all my readers..
ajami just balik tgk 'james bond: casino royale' dan inilah rebiu ajami psl 'screenplay' kolaborasi oleh:
- Neal Purvis
- Robert Wade
- Paul Haggis
sblm tu pls baca quote dr buku Story: Substance, Structure, Style and The Principles of Screenwriting by Robert McKee (pg.103 & 104)
***
CHARACTER ARC: Taking the principle further yet: The finest writing not only reveals true character, but arcs of changes that inner nature, for better or worse, over the course of the telling.
***
CHARACTER REVELATION
The revelation of true character in contrast or contradiction to characterization is fundamental to all fine storytelling. What seems is not what it is. People are not what they appear to be. A hidden nature waits concealed behind a facade of traits. No matter what they say, no matter how they comport themselves, the only way we ever come to know characters in depth is through their choices under pressure.
..there have been nearly twenty Bond films. Bond goes on and on because the world delights in the repeated revelation of a deep character that contradicts characterization. Bond enjoys playing the lounge lizard: Dressed in tuxedo, he graces posh parties, a cocktail glass dangling from his fingertips as he chats up beautiful women. But then story pessure builds and Bond's choices reveal that underneath his lounge lizard exterior is a thinking man's Rambo. (comparing to Rambo's flat pattern to James Bond) This expose of witty super-hero in contradiction to playboy characterization has become a seemingly endless pleasure.
Taking the principle further: The revelation of deep character in contrast or contradiction to characterization is fundamental in major characters. Minor roles may or may not need hidden dimensions, but principals must be written in depth - they cannot be at heart what they seem to be at face.
***
ajami bukanlah 'die-hard-fan' James Bond's francise films. tapi Casino Royale mengajar teknik menulis 'perwatakan' dlm sesebuah skrip. sblm ini saya 'kurang selesa' dgn watak super-duper-mega-hero JB coz dia sgt ego, gilakan pompuan, minum wain yg mahal2, bermewah-mewah dgn kereta & wardrobe-nya, ada gadget yg canggih-mangih, brutal killer/assasin, muka selamba & buat dek control macho/hensem dia! yalah! coz dia kan JB mesti extra-vaganza-avanza punya hero kan? dah azali dia mcm tu!.. then saya tgk Casino Royale which is the prekuel dpd JB2 yg lain sblm ini. pd pndpt saya, ia adalah backstory of who is JB seblm dia bersifat/perwatakan spt di atas tadi. sebabtu saya respek dgn kolaborasi Neil Purvis, Robert Wade & Paul Haggis yg berjaya menggarap screenplay Casino Royale yg menarik itu, yg sepatutnya menjadi the 1st JB film yg tidak dpt dibuat dahulu krn sebab2 rights dr novel Ian Fleming yg pertama. Casino Royale ialah muqadimah kisah2 JB utk sekuel seterusnya. (pls baca cerapan internet berikut)
***
ref: http://www.iht.com/articles/2006/11/16/style/fmreview17.php
"Casino Royale," introduced Bond to the world; it was made into a 1954 live- television drama with the American actor Barry Nelson as Jimmy Bond and, in the following decade, into a ham-fisted spoof with David Niven as the spy and a very funny Peter Sellers as a card shark. For reasons that are too boring to repeat, when Ian Fleming sold the film rights to Bond, "Casino Royale" was not part of the deal. As a consequence, the producers who held most of the rights decided to take their cue from news reports about misfired missiles, placing their bets on "Dr. No" and its missile- mad villain. The first Bond film, it hit in October 1962, the same month that Fleming's fan John F. Kennedy took the Cuban missile crisis public.
***
apa yg ajami kaitkan juga dgn McKee's character arc di atas is Casino Royale ialah kisah JB yg perlu diambil sbg rujukan how character arc dibuat dlm sesebuah skrip. 1 lagi unsur dlm skrip yg dilakukan dlm Casino Royale ialah spt cerapan 1 lagi tulisan McKee:
An IMAGE SYSTEM is a strategy of motifs, a category of imagery embedded in the film that repeats in sight and variation, but with equaly great subtlety, as a subliminal communication to increase the depth and complexity of aesthetic emotion.
- Story: Substance, Structure, Style and The Principles of Screenwriting by Robert McKee (pg.401)
***

If you take a life do you know what you'll give?


Comments
she prefers that guy ... wolverine in X-Men :-)
so no james bond for us :((
JB should be smooth but slick.
Azer, aku pun cam bini lu gak. Kalau Wolverine jadi Jebon..aku sanggup jadi maid dia :)
Daniel Craig too manly and too blond i think. Handsome dia jenis 'rough & rugged' unlike Pierce Brosnan and Roger Moore yang nampak agak suave dan terrer mengayat. Anyway Mr. Craig sesuai untuk aksi lasak, lebih baik dari Colin Farrel bushy brow ittew.
Eric Bana tak handsome? Sapo kata? Meh sini aku pukul orang itew *matilah gajah meroyan..lariiik
Bana memang tak ensem!
Tapi Eva Green is hot! Period!
bana seswai jd monster 'hulk' jer 24jam! kaler ijau! seswai dicouplekn dgn misteque X-men: ijau+biru=cicakman! erk?
>>suma org ada pilihan msg2 & berhak memilih sesapa saje yg dirasakn seswai as JB.. ni mcm kes kita nya 'imagenary friend/superheroes' masa kecik2 dulu kan?.. fyi, Daniel Craig was NOT the 1st choice for JB but si Ewan McGregor yg menolak rezeki..
>>but then the producer dia ckp he was THE ONLY choice for JB not Dougray Scott or Hugh Jackman or Ewan McGregor!
"They looked at more than 200 candidates, according to producer Michael Wilson, over a period of a year and a half. Some of them included Clive Owen, Dougray Scott, Gerald Butler, Colin Firth, Heath Ledger, Jason Statham, Jude Law, Ewan McGregor, Eric Bana, Hugh Jackman and Colin Farrell. But a leaked memo from Eon Productions revealed they thought Bana was "not handsome enough," Jackman "too fey," Farrell "too sleazy" and McGregor, who stands the same 5-foot-10 as Craig, "too short."
>>if u ask me sapa yg aku nak imagine jd JB but versi melayulah? ahaks!
>> Jins Shamsuddin (semasa muda!)
Fri Nov 24, 07:54:00 AM 2006
*RE-COMMENT coz html sudah larrikk!